Two parts. APY tool: reads pricePerShare via Base RPC (no key). P&L with Mean Reversion: ETH/BTC swing to a peak/trough and revert to 1.0 at the chosen horizon; compare 20/30/50 mix vs wBLT (USD) = mix × pps and show $ outcomes.
Why wBLT makes sense
- Compounding engine: pricePerShare grows as the vault earns fees → more underlying BLT per wBLT over time.
- Up‑only vs BLT: pps doesn't go down with BLT; it only ratchets up as fees accrue. USD still moves with BLT.
- Smoothed ride: BLT exposure is modeled as 20% ETH / 30% BTC / 50% USDC, which dampens drawdowns vs. pure BTC/ETH.
- Chop‑friendly: If crypto round‑trips (ends where it started), pps keeps compounding → wBLT can still finish higher.
Glossary: APY = annualized yield; pricePerShare (pps) = how much BLT each wBLT represents; "normalized" = series scaled so the start is 1.0; "drawdown" = worst peak→trough drop.
Not advice. Crypto is volatile; USD results depend on BLT/USD. Fees, gas, and implementation details can affect realized returns.
Not advice. Crypto is volatile; USD results depend on BLT/USD. Fees, gas, and implementation details can affect realized returns.
Contract: 0x4e74d4db6c0726ccded4656d0bce448876bb4c7a
Latest block: —
pps now: —
—
📊
No Data Available
Click "Compute" to fetch APY data and generate the chart
APY (%) by lookback (left axis) and wBLT pricePerShare (normalized; oldest = 1) on the right axis.
📋
No Data Available
APY data will appear here after clicking "Compute"
wBLT composition
Modeled exposure used in the simulator and charts:
- BTC: 30%
- ETH: 20%
- USDC: 50%